On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 4:23 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
> > On 3 Aug 2022, at 10:10, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think in the following sentence, were should be replaced with have,
> > what do you think?
> >
> > ```
> > /*
> > - * We were just issued a SAVEPOINT inside a
> > transaction block.
> > + * We have just issued a SAVEPOINT inside a
> > transaction block.
> > * Start a subtransaction. (DefineSavepoint already did
> > * PushTransaction, so as to have someplace to
> > put the SUBBEGIN
> > * state.)
> > ```
>
> I'm not so sure. If I read this right the intent of the sentence is to convey
> that the user has issued a SAVEPOINT to the backend, not the backend itself. I
> think the current wording is the correct one.
>
Got it, using `were` here means the backend is the receiver of the
action, not the sender.
That makes sense, thanks a lot.
> --
> Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
>
--
Regards
Junwang Zhao
