On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:44 PM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 at 22:37, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:25 PM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> I try to set idle_in_transaction_session_timeout after begin transaction,
> >> it changes immediately, so I think transaction_timeout should also be take
> >> immediately.
> >
> > Ah, right, idle_in_transaction_session_timeout is set after the set
> > command finishes and before the backend send *ready for query*
> > to the client, so the value of the GUC is already set before
> > next command.
> >
>
> I mean, is it possible to set transaction_timeout before next comand?
>
Yeah, it's possible, set transaction_timeout in the when it first
goes into *idle in transaction* mode, see the attached files.
>
> --
> Regrads,
> Japin Li
> ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
--
Regards
Junwang Zhao
