Re: jsonpath: Inconsistency of timestamp_tz() Output - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Junwang Zhao
Subject Re: jsonpath: Inconsistency of timestamp_tz() Output
Date
Msg-id CAEG8a3+QHYaLk+g8_LDnpbPMEC-Ht7-mOV2OsvTqqCmbWWJhew@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jsonpath: Inconsistency of timestamp_tz() Output  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>)
Responses Re: jsonpath: Inconsistency of timestamp_tz() Output
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 10:22 PM David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 9, 2024, at 10:07, David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> wrote:
>
> > So perhaps I had things reversed before. Maybe it’s actually doing the right then when it converts a timestamp to a
timestamptz,but not when it the input contains an offset, as in your example. 
>
> To clarify, there’s an inconsistency in the output of timestamp_tz() depending on whether the input has an offset or
not.With offset: 
>
> david=# select jsonb_path_query_tz('"2024-08-15 12:34:56-05"', '$.timestamp_tz()');
>      jsonb_path_query_tz
> -----------------------------
>  "2024-08-15T12:34:56-05:00"
>
> And without:
>
> david=# select jsonb_path_query_tz('"2024-08-15 12:34:56"', '$.timestamp_tz()');
>      jsonb_path_query_tz
> -----------------------------
>  "2024-08-15T16:34:56+00:00"
>
> I suspect the latter is correct, given that the timestamptz type appears to be an int64, presumably always in UTC. I
don’tunderstand where the first example stores the offset. 

In JsonbValue.val.datatime, there is a tz field, I think that's where
the offset stored, it is 18000 in the first example

struct
{
  Datum value;
  Oid typid;
  int32 typmod;
  int tz; /* Numeric time zone, in seconds, for
            * TimestampTz data type */
} datetime;

>
> Best,
>
> David
>
>
>


--
Regards
Junwang Zhao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeremy Schneider
Date:
Subject: Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: array_in sub function ReadArrayDimensions error message