Re: Backup Method - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Guillaume Lelarge
Subject Re: Backup Method
Date
Msg-id CAECtzeW4tQ9kvjyfCZm+Svi8mGx063DZ+82TTBvDRfW20u9tcw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Backup Method  ("howardnews@selestial.com" <howardnews@selestial.com>)
Responses Re: Backup Method  ("howardnews@selestial.com" <howardnews@selestial.com>)
List pgsql-general

Le 3 juil. 2015 12:03 PM, "howardnews@selestial.com" <howardnews@selestial.com> a écrit :
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am reaching the point with my database backups where the backups are taking too long, and starting to interfere with running of the system during the day. So I am looking for a bit of sage advice as to how to proceed.
>
> For a typical server, I have a single database cluster with multiple database that I backup nightly using sequential pg_dumps to NFS.
>
> So what I am looking for is a backup regime with less impact that will run overnight but faster or less impact than the pg_dump.
>
> Would a file system backup be the better option in PITR format, or is pg_dumpall more efficient than pg_dump?
>

pg_dumpall is not more efficient than pg_dump. As far as I can tell, you're looking for PITR backups.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Fabio Pardi
Date:
Subject: max number of locks
Next
From: "howardnews@selestial.com"
Date:
Subject: Re: Backup Method