Re: Autovacuum and idle_session_timeout - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Guillaume Lelarge
Subject Re: Autovacuum and idle_session_timeout
Date
Msg-id CAECtzeVVTEQ2L12uMZQzoMc7mwTagWcKPqfw9QUGY5Y-kbP__Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovacuum and idle_session_timeout  (Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum and idle_session_timeout  (Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Le jeu. 30 déc. 2021 à 11:44, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> a écrit :

On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 17:18, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been reading the autovacuum code (the launcher and the worker) on the
> 14 branch. As previously, I've seen some configuration at the beginning,
> especially for statement_timeout, lock_timeout and
> idle_in_transaction_session_timeout, and I was surprised to discover there
> was no configuration for idle_session_timeout. I'm not sure the code should
> set it to 0 as well (otherwise I'd have written a patch), but, if there was
> a decision made to ignore its value, I'd be interested to know the reason.
> I could guess for the autovacuum worker (it seems to work in a transaction,
> so it's already handled by the idle_in_transaction_timeout), but I have no
> idea for the autovacuum launcher.
>
> If it was just missed, I could write a patch this week to fix this.
>

Oh, it was just missed. I didn't note set autovacuum code set those settings,
I think we should also set idle_session_timeout to 0.

Should we also change this for pg_dump and pg_backup_archiver?


pg_dump works in a single transaction, so it's already dealt with idle_in_transaction_timeout. Though I guess setting both would work too.


--
Guillaume.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Japin Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum and idle_session_timeout
Next
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Foreign key joins revisited