We want to make sure no two examiners are working on the same case at the same time, where the cases are found by searching on certain criteria with limit 1 to get the "next case".
select id into next_case_id
from cases c
where unfinished = true
and not exists (select 1 from table_lock
where table_name = 'case' and row_id =
c.id)
limit 1;
if found then
insert into table_lock (table_name, row_id) values ('case', next_case_id);
end if;
return next_case_id;
I suspect it would be possible for two users to get the same case locked that way. Yes?
If so, would adding "for update" to the initial select prevent a second caller to block on their select until the first caller had written out the lock, effectively preventing two callers from locking the same case?
If not, can we do better by bundling it all into one statement?:
with nc as (select c.id clm_id from cases c
where unfinished = true
and not exists (select 1 from table_lock
where table_name = 'case' and row_id =
c.id)
limit 1
) , ic as (insert into rdf (iasid, s,p,oint) select 42, user_id, 'started-editing', clm_id from nc returning oint locked) select locked from ic limit 1 into locked_id; return locked_id;
If I am all wet, is their a reliable way to achieve this?
Thx, kt
--
Kenneth Tilton
Director of Software Development
MCNA Dental Plans
200 West Cypress Creek Road
Suite 500
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
ktilton
@mcna.net (Email)www.mcna.net (Website)CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this electronic mail or its contents by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail so that we may correct our internal records. Please then delete the original message. Thank you.
