> On 11/10/21, 9:43 AM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > > As discussed in [1], isn't it a better idea to add some of activity > > messages [2] such as recovery, archive, backup, streaming etc. to > > server logs at LOG level?
> I think this would make the logs far too noisy for many servers. For > archiving alone, this could cause tens of thousands more log messages > per hour on a busy system. I think you can already see such > information at a debug level, anyway.
Yeah. If we had some sort of ring buffer in which to store these messages, the user could examine them through a view; they would still be accessible in a running server, but they would not be written to the server log.
That's a good idea. How about also adding some GUC(s) to the log archive, recovery related log messages just like we have for checkpoints, autovacuum etc? Maybe something like log_archive, log_recovery etc.
