Re: Auto Vacuum of pg_catalog tables causes huge delay in opening new connections - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Mike Roest
Subject Re: Auto Vacuum of pg_catalog tables causes huge delay in opening new connections
Date
Msg-id CAE7ByhiHQTuCYHxzS6dx8DKUfft8csWOrcci9cv2daQHZxs3vA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Auto Vacuum of pg_catalog tables causes huge delay in opening new connections  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Hi Tom,
   On the test box this seems to have completely resolved our problem. 

I'll be scheduling an upgrade on the production cluster to verify it.  

Thanks


On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Mike Roest <mike.roest@replicon.com> writes:
>    We have a interesting thing happening on one of our DB's that when
> autovacuum runs against the pg_catalog tables (or we run a manual vacuum)
> we get a large delay in opening new connections.

I think you're hitting the problem that was fixed here:

Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Branch: master Release: REL9_2_BR [532fe28da] 2012-05-26 19:09:52 -0400
Branch: REL9_1_STABLE Release: REL9_1_4 [6c1bf45ea] 2012-05-26 19:09:59 -0400
Branch: REL9_0_STABLE Release: REL9_0_8 [2ce097e6e] 2012-05-26 19:10:05 -0400
Branch: REL8_4_STABLE Release: REL8_4_12 [35cc2be6f] 2012-05-26 19:10:13 -0400
Branch: REL8_3_STABLE Release: REL8_3_19 [422022b12] 2012-05-26 19:10:19 -0400

    Prevent synchronized scanning when systable_beginscan chooses a heapscan.

    The only interesting-for-performance case wherein we force heapscan here
    is when we're rebuilding the relcache init file, and the only such case
    that is likely to be examining a catalog big enough to be syncscanned is
    RelationBuildTupleDesc.  But the early-exit optimization in that code gets
    broken if we start the scan at a random place within the catalog, so that
    allowing syncscan is actually a big deoptimization if pg_attribute is large
    (at least for the normal case where the rows for core system catalogs have
    never been changed since initdb).  Hence, prevent syncscan here.  Per my
    testing pursuant to complaints from Jeff Frost and Greg Sabino Mullane,
    though neither of them seem to have actually hit this specific problem.

    Back-patch to 8.3, where syncscan was introduced.

> For our setup we're running postgres 9.1.1 compiled from source on Centos
> 5.8 x64 (Dual Xeon x5650 with 32 gigs of ram)

Try updating ...

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mike Christensen
Date:
Subject: Re: What is the state of the art for using LINQ with PostgreSQL?
Next
From: Feridun türk
Date:
Subject: