Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Improve geometric types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Emre Hasegeli
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Date
Msg-id CAE2gYzzn=NYsKs-6UOrjjxi1yFR0=S1qOK43D5dPOtiPVKPdEw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Improve geometric types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Improve geometric types
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> Now, it's also not clear that anything in PG really cares.  But if we
> do care, I think we should keep pg_hypot() ... and maybe clarify the
> comment a bit more.

I am not sure how useful NaNs are in geometric types context, but we
allow them, so inconsistent hypot() would be a problem.  I will change
my patches to keep pg_hypot().


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brent Dearth
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Horrible CREATE DATABASE Performance in High Sierra
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Horrible CREATE DATABASE Performance in High Sierra