> I don’t see how to solve this problem without changing explain analyze output to accommodate for “unknown” value. I
don’tthink “0” is a non-confusing representation of “unknown” for most people, and from the practical standpoint, a
“besteffort” estimate is better than 0 (i.e. I will be able to estimate how efficient BRIN index is for my tables in
termsof the number of tuples retrieved/thrown away)
The number of retrieved and thrown away rows are already available on
the upper part of the plan. Bitmap Index Scan should provide the rows
that matched the index. Another alternative would be just returning
the number of matching pages (by not multiplying with 10). It might
be better understood. The users who can understand the EXPLAIN
ANALYZE output shouldn't be expecting BRIN to return rows.
