Re: setproctitle_fast() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Emre Hasegeli
Subject Re: setproctitle_fast()
Date
Msg-id CAE2gYzy=g2iAhFA3yVQ+_ZgZsiBnGwF2S7BwFX4QOcvZneyeHg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to setproctitle_fast()  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: setproctitle_fast()  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> FreeBSD's setproctitle() is a bit slow because it contains a syscall
> or two, so people often run PostgreSQL with update_process_title set
> to off on that OS.  That makes the user experience not quite as nice
> as Linux.  As a weekend learn-me-some-kernel-hacking project I fixed
> that and got the patch committed to FreeBSD 12, though I was asked to
> use a new libc entry point _fast().  Here's a patch to teach
> PostgreSQL about that.  It doesn't have much effect on small systems,
> but it makes "pgbench -c 40 -j 40 -S -M prepared" do ~10% more
> transactions per second on an AWS m4.10xlarge instance.

I am curious why they asked you to use a new libc entry point.  The
function signatures are the same.  More people could benefit from
making the existing function faster.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?
Next
From: Brent Kerby
Date:
Subject: Re: Transition relations: correlating OLD TABLE and NEW TABLE