> After looking at 05 again, I don't like the "same as %" business.
> Creating a whole new class of exceptions is not my thing, particularly
> not in a regression test whose sole purpose is to look for exceptional
> (a.k.a. "wrong") cases. I would much rather define the opclasses for
> those two datatypes using the existing @> operators rather than create
> && operators for this purpose. We can add a note to the docs, "for
> historical reasons the brin opclass for datatype box/point uses the <@
> operator instead of &&", or something like that.
I worked around this by adding point <@ box operator as the overlap
strategy and removed additional && operators.
> AFAICS this is just some pretty small changes to patches 05 and 06.
> Will you please resubmit?
New series of patches are attached. Note that
brin-inclusion-v08-04-fix-brin-deform-tuple.patch is the one from you.
