Re: [GENERAL] pgbench initialize - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vladimir Rusinov
Subject Re: [GENERAL] pgbench initialize
Date
Msg-id CAE1wr-xrxjQZacyDDn=_N0+onAvDbL-hcorhVMo_s01ZBajtMQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [GENERAL] pgbench initialize  (Anirudh Jayakumar <jayakumar.anirudh@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Depends on goals of your benchmarking.
What are you trying to achieve?

Initialization and vacuuming each time will help achieve more consistent best-case numbers (to reduce variance, I'd also destroy cluster completely and clean up hardware, e.g. run fstrim in case of SSD, etc).

If you are however after real-world numbers, you may want to initialize once and run pgbench for hours if not days to get full effects of autovaccuum and other possible background processes.

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:17 PM Anirudh Jayakumar <jayakumar.anirudh@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I have a couple of questions regarding pgbench. I'm new to PostgreSQL and databases in general, so these might be very trivial questions. 

1. Is it necessary to initialize pgbench(-i option) before every run to get consistent results?

2. The vacuuming process after initialize consumes time, what are the ill effects of disabling post-initialize vacuuming?

Thanks,
Anirudh
Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] tuple data size and compression
Next
From: "Andomar"
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] Allow login on slave only