Hello, Álvaro!
> I didn't understand why you have a few "v19" patches and also a separate
> series of "v19-only-part-3-" patches. Is there duplication? How do
> people know which series comes first?
This was explained in the previous email [0]:
> Patch itself contains 4 parts, some of them may be reviewed/committed
> separately. All commit messages are detailed and contain additional
> explanation of changes.
> To not confuse CFBot, commits are presented in the following way: part
> 1, 2, 3 and 4. If you want only part 3 to test/review – check the
> files with "patch_" extensions. They differ a little bit, but changes
> are minor.
If you have an idea of a better way to handle it, please share. Yes,
the current approach is a bit odd.
> I think it would be better to get the PDF poster in a wiki page ... in
> fact I would suggest to Andrey that he could start a wiki page with all
> the PDFs presented at the conference. Distributing a bunch of 2 MB pdf
> via the mailing list doesn't sound too great an idea to me. A few
> people are having trouble with email quotas in cloud services, and the
> list server gets bothered because of it. Kindly don't do that anymore.
Oh, you're right—I just didn't think of that. My bad, sorry about that.
Best regards,
Mikhail.
[0]:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CADzfLwVOcZ9mg8gOG%2BKXWurt%3DMHRcqNv3XSECYoXyM3ENrxyfQ%40mail.gmail.com#52c97e004b8f628473124c05e3bf2da1
