> I'm not sure if it's a bug or feature, but I find error message misleading. > ERROR: relation [“schema_name.table_name”] does not exist gives an > impression that schema name is part of relation name. Should not it be > ERROR: relation [“schema name”].["table_name"] does not exist instead? I > doubt it's a bug, because this message seems version not specific. But does > not it look wrong?
I doubt that it can really be considered a bug, since it is functioning as designed.
On the other hand, it's annoying for copy/paste, especially with camel case names.
While I don't disagree for the examples I've seen you would just copy from the LINE 1 of context...
