[GENERAL] [pgsql-GENERAL] AUTOVACUUM and Streaming Replication in v9.5 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Sameer Kumar
Subject [GENERAL] [pgsql-GENERAL] AUTOVACUUM and Streaming Replication in v9.5
Date
Msg-id CADp-Sm5Exbf_ZNL-kZ4Di8PE_GAOtt4SnkSesxD4Z-B+g7iMfA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-general
Hi,

I was wondering if there is some change in the way max_standby_streaming_delay and hot_standby_feedback work in v9.5.

Below is a scenario which I had built to test out something but the behavior confused me. I would like to check if there is something/some parameter which I am missing or if my understanding is wrong.

I have a Standby Server with hot_standby_feedback set to off.

My max_standby_streaming_delay is set to 30s.

I started a transaction on standby with repeatable read isolation level. I fired a select

select count(*) from table_a;

This gave me result 60000;

I deleted a huge chunk of rows on Primary for table_a.

I can see that autovaccum lauched an autovacuum and autoanalyze (going by the timestamp in pg_stat_user_tables for table_a) after these deletes. For a short period of time I also saw that pg_class.reltuples was reduced to a smaller number (I think because of deletions).

But when I checked again, pg_stat_user_tables on master revealed that autovacuum has triggered a few times since the deletion for table_a. I also noted that on master pg_class.reltuples are back to roughly 60000 (which was the case before deletion).

I thought if my hot_standby_feedback is off, I might face an issue with rows being removed by vacuum. But that did not happen. Can someone help me to understand how MVCC, autovacuum work with Streaming replication.



Regards
Sameer
--

-- 

Best Regards,

Sameer Kumar | DB Solution Architect

ASHNIK PTE. LTD.

101 Cecil Street, #11-11 Tong Eng Building, Singapore 069533

T: +65 6438 3504 | www.ashnik.com

Skype: sameer.ashnik |   T: +65 8110 0350


www.ashnik.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom DalPozzo
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] tuple data size and compression
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] tuple data size and compression