Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Corey Huinker
Subject Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
Date
Msg-id CADkLM=cYanWQsJ54JtrWZKSPtF7+amHyQdwyjYtZgZWz-bBXBQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Rebased patches attached.

I'm reviewing the changes since v6, which was my last review.

Making ExecLockTableTuple() it's own function makes sense.
Snapshots are now accounted for.
The changes that account for n-level partitioning makes sense as well.

Passes make check-world.
Not user facing, so no user documentation required.
Marking as ready for committer again.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: jff: checksum algorithm is not as intended
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: create table like: ACCESS METHOD