On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> writes: > I reworked the test such that all of the foreign tables inherit from the > same parent table, and if you query that you do get async execution. But It > doesn't work when just stringing together those foreign tables with UNION > ALLs.
> I don't know how to proceed with this review if that was a goal of the > patch.
Whether it was a goal or not, I'd say there is something either broken or incorrectly implemented if you don't see that. The planner (and therefore also the executor) generally treats inheritance the same as simple UNION ALL. If that's not the case here, I'd want to know why.
regards, tom lane
Updated commitfest entry to "Returned With Feedback".
