Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] New command to monitor progression of longrunning queries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Remi Colinet
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] New command to monitor progression of longrunning queries
Date
Msg-id CADdR5nxbQG+7Uk4_YR3r+cYZ3PbbYTK--cNeLpAsGR=7cZMQkg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] New command to monitor progression of longrunning queries  (Vinayak Pokale <vinpokale@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Do you have more details about the failed tests?

Regards,
Remi

2017-05-06 5:38 GMT+02:00 Vinayak Pokale <vinpokale@gmail.com>:

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Remi Colinet <remi.colinet@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

I've implemented a new command named PROGRESS to monitor progression of long running SQL queries in a backend process.

Thank you for the patch.

I am testing your patch but after applying your patch other regression test failed.

$ make installcheck
13 of 178 tests failed.

Regards,
Vinayak 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was:Declarative partitioning - another take)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] If subscription to foreign table valid ?