Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonah H. Harris
Subject Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.
Date
Msg-id CADUqk8WTKZi8WBF7oJh-KrDLkEcPgH2HQ+AenFTHO1VCGRYeNQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Our naming of wait events is a disaster.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:16 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
My inclination is to propose that we settle on the first style
shown above, which is the majority case now, and rename the
other events to fit that.  As long as we're breaking compatibility
anyway, I'd also like to shorten one or two of the very longest
names, because they're just giving me fits in fixing the PDF
rendering.  (They would make a mess of the display of
pg_stat_activity, too, anytime they come up in the field.)

Thoughts?

+1

--
Jonah H. Harris

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY, lock release and MVCC