Re: REINDEX deadlock - Postgresql -9.1 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Anoop K
Subject Re: REINDEX deadlock - Postgresql -9.1
Date
Msg-id CADK_1hJLF7oJEg89-1-NL1i2=nmGY5W1j-Ey=pgYg4A-MQmWMQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: REINDEX deadlock - Postgresql -9.1  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Responses Re: REINDEX deadlock - Postgresql -9.1  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
List pgsql-general
Yes, we do that.

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:53 AM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:

>  On 2/10/2013 9:55 PM, Anoop K wrote:
>
> We analyzed the application side. It doesn't seem to be create a
> transaction and keep it open. StackTraces indicate that it is BLOCKED in
> JDBC openConnection.
>
>  Any JDBC driver issue or other scenarios which can result in <*idle in
> transaction*> ?
>
>
> JDBC has a wretched habit of autostarting transactions on any query if the
> connection is not in autocommit mode.  if you don't want to use autocommit
> mode, then you need to issue Commit() calls after each batch of queries,
> even if the queries are read only, to release any implied locks.
>
>
>
>
> --
> john r pierce                                      37N 122W
> somewhere on the middle of the left coast
>
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: REINDEX deadlock - Postgresql -9.1
Next
From: Sergey Konoplev
Date:
Subject: Re: REINDEX deadlock - Postgresql -9.1