Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Date
Msg-id CADK3HHLEdsTK9ytTQ+XQwgCwv7vptNrS-xpYBbk_MUQApSBEEg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
Responses RE: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers



On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 18:03, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 01:02, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>
>> > From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:ishii@sraoss.co.jp]
>> >> But pg_is_in_recovery() returns true even for a promoting standby. So
>> >> you have to wait and retry to send pg_is_in_recovery() until it
>> >> finishes the promotion to find out it is now a primary. I am not sure
>> >> if backend out to be responsible for this process. If not, libpq would
>> >> need to handle it but I doubt it would be possible.
>> >
>> > Yes, the application needs to retry connection attempts until success.
>> That's not different from PgJDBC and other DBMSs.
>>
>> I don't know what PgJDBC is doing, however I think libpq needs to do
>> more than just retrying.
>>
>> 1) Try to find a node on which pg_is_in_recovery() returns false. If
>>    found, then we assume that is the primary. We also assume that
>>    other nodes are standbys. done.
>>
>> 2) If there's no node on which pg_is_in_recovery() returns false, then
>>    we need to retry until we find it. To not retry forever, there
>>    should be a timeout counter parameter.
>>
>>
> IIRC this is essentially what pgJDBC does.

Thanks for clarifying that. Pgpool-II also does that too. Seems like a
common technique to find out a primary node.


Checking the code I see we actually use show transaction_read_only. 

Sorry for the confusion


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order(regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)