Re: Collection of small fixes to binary transfer code and unit tests - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Collection of small fixes to binary transfer code and unit tests
Date
Msg-id CADK3HHJpQ_09iOUtz6rNyB0UZ3wzSZMG+8CBkEJOHC28M9iPiw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Collection of small fixes to binary transfer code and unit tests  (Mikko Tiihonen <mikko.tiihonen@nitorcreations.com>)
Responses Re: Collection of small fixes to binary transfer code and unit tests
List pgsql-jdbc
Mikko,

I get the following errors after applying your patch.

    [junit] Testcase:
testMaxFieldSize(org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.ResultSetTest):
FAILED
    [junit] null expected:<[12345]> but was:<[09]>
    [junit] junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: null expected:<[12345]>
but was:<[09]>
    [junit]     at
org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.ResultSetTest.testMaxFieldSize(ResultSetTest.java:174)
    [junit]
    [junit]
    [junit] Testcase:
testGetTimestampWTZ(org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest):
FAILED
    [junit] expected:<2000-07-07 11:00:00.123> but was:<2000-07-07
11:00:00.122999>
    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<2000-07-07
11:00:00.123> but was:<2000-07-07 11:00:00.122999>
    [junit]     at
org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest.timestampTestWTZ(TimestampTest.java:436)
    [junit]     at
org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest.testGetTimestampWTZ(TimestampTest.java:188)
    [junit]
    [junit]
    [junit] Testcase:
testSetTimestampWTZ(org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest):
FAILED
    [junit] expected:<2000-07-07 11:00:00.123> but was:<2000-07-07
11:00:00.122999>
    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<2000-07-07
11:00:00.123> but was:<2000-07-07 11:00:00.122999>
    [junit]     at
org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest.timestampTestWTZ(TimestampTest.java:436)
    [junit]     at
org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest.testSetTimestampWTZ(TimestampTest.java:258)

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca




On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Mikko Tiihonen
<mikko.tiihonen@nitorcreations.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to run the unit tests with forcebinary=true and
> preparethreshold=1 and got 10 new failures.
> Of them 3 are real bugs (corner cases, but still bugs), rest are just
> problems in tests.
>
> So here are some patches to fix them:
>
> binary-force-harder-tests.patch
> - forces prepare threshold to 1 when forcebinary=true and thus makes the
> bugs visible
>
> binary-fix-some-serverprepared-tests-with-force.patch
> - the previous patch forcing prepare threshold of 1 breaks 2 tests that test
> disabling of preparethreshold
> - just skip part of the tests when forcebinary=true
>
> binary-fix-maxfieldlength-test.patch
> - test used getBytes on integer field which returns different bytes for txt
> vs bin transfers
> - fixes the unit test to cope with both bin and txt encoding
>
> binary-fix-date-infinity.patch (bug)
> - the backend sends a smaller infinity value for DATE than TIMESTAMP fields
> (4 bytes vs 8 bytes)
> - to ensure compatibility with text protocol convert smaller infinity values
>  to larger infinity values when receiving DATE from backend
>
> binary-fix-arrays-with-zero-dimensions.patch (bug)
> - the new binary code for arrays did not handle arrays with dimension of
> zero
> - fix it and add a new test case for array.getResultSet()
>
> binary-fix-batch-with-generated-keys.patch (bug)
> - when executing batch with generated keys returned for each insert the same
>  Query object is shared by the statements, and along with it the field
> definitions
> - when the prepare threshold is exceeded during the batch execution the
> first
>  row of generated keys return text values and latter rows binary values
> - to fix we detect the situation and force a separate describe round-trip
> when
>  batch is about to exceed the prepare threshold limit so that all generated
>  in the same result set will be binary
>
> binary-fix-timezonetests.patch
> - based on my patch from 2007 to make the timezonetests 'fair' so that
> binary transfer has a chance of passing them
> - some tests in TimezoneTest never actually exercised the correct code paths
> because they just used getString which
>  just returns the text from the server and does not cause the jdbc driver to
> try to parse the output
> - it is not possible in binary transfer mode for the jdbc driver to generate
> the exactly same getString output for
>  all time values than what the server does - instead it uses the toString()
> method of the official java.sql classes
> - fixes the testSetTimestampOnTime, testSetTimestamp, testSetDate,
> testSetTime to use proper getTime/getTimestamp
>  etc methods when fetching columns instead of relying on the getString
> - also changes the code verifying that inserts worked correctly to request
> the server for the actual values in the
>  database casted to text type so that both binary and text transfer get the
> same results
>
>
> -Mikko
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
>

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Mikko Tiihonen
Date:
Subject: Collection of small fixes to binary transfer code and unit tests
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Collection of small fixes to binary transfer code and unit tests