On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 at 07:08, Dave Cramer <davecramer@postgres.rocks> wrote: > > On Tue, 31 May 2022 at 14:51, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: >> > I think it's reasonable to have two adjacent rows in the table for these >> > two closely related things, but rather than "columns per tuple" I would >> > label the second one "columns in a result set". This is easy enough to >> > understand and to differentiate from the other limit. >> >> OK, with that wording it's probably clear enough.
> Reworded patch attached
I see the patch does not have the same text as what was proposed and seconded above. My personal preferences would be "result set columns", but "columns in a result set" seems fine too.
I've adjusted the patch to use the wording proposed by Alvaro. See attached.
I will push this shortly.
David
Thanks David, Apparently I am truly unable to multi-task.
