Re: Use of the word master - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Use of the word master
Date
Msg-id CADK3HHJgrJ=vRK_P_6zXQtRKgm3ek0Rnm8og7MTUgcKXup7fyg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Use of the word master  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-docs


On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 19:19, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
On 8/5/21 2:26 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> PostgreSQL: Documentation: 13: 30.1. Publication
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/logical-replication-publication.html>
>
>
> "A /publication/ can be defined on any physical replication master."
>
> I would propose "any physical replication primary"

It could be any instance that's writable though. Perhaps:

"A publication can be defined on any database that can accept writes."

or

"A publication can be defined on any database that is not in recovery."

That said, +1 for the wording change.


Ya, the word primary is misleading here. I prefer  

"A publication can be defined on any database that can accept writes."

as

"A publication can be defined on any database that is not in recovery."

introduces the concept of recovery which does not in my opinion add any clarity.

Dave

 

Jonathan

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of the word master
Next
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: incorrect information in documentation