Re: Timestamp vs. Java Date/Timestamp - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Timestamp vs. Java Date/Timestamp
Date
Msg-id CADK3HHJDvnHzcbEu2CMJ7g_riuMTi6D-=1mdvc+T-9DYEidvJA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Timestamp vs. Java Date/Timestamp  (Andreas Reichel <andreas@manticore-projects.com>)
Responses Re: Timestamp vs. Java Date/Timestamp  (Andreas Reichel <andreas@manticore-projects.com>)
Re: Timestamp vs. Java Date/Timestamp  (Andreas Reichel <andreas@manticore-projects.com>)
Re: Timestamp vs. Java Date/Timestamp  (Andreas Reichel <andreas@manticore-projects.com>)
Re: Timestamp vs. Java Date/Timestamp  (Andreas Reichel <andreas@manticore-projects.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Andreas,

What are you using to setTimestamp in the prepared statement ? setDate or setTimestamp ?

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Andreas Reichel <andreas@manticore-projects.com> wrote:
Dear List,

the last day I had a hard time figuring out how to hand over timestamps
using prepared statements.

The table looks like this:

trader=# \d trader.tickdata
                   Table "trader.tickdata"
      Column       |            Type             | Modifiers
-------------------+-----------------------------+-----------
 id_instrument     | smallint                    | not null
 id_stock_exchange | smallint                    | not null
 timestamp         | timestamp without time zone | not null
 price             | double precision            | not null


Now I would like to retrieve ticks using a prepared statement like this:

-- GET TICKDATA
select
        t1.id_instrument,
        t1.id_stock_exchange,
        t1."timestamp",
        t1.price,
        coalesce(t2.quantity,0) quantity
from
        trader.tickdata t1
        left join trader.volumedata t2
                ON (t1.id_instrument=t2.id_instrument AND
t1.id_stock_exchange=t2.id_stock_exchange AND
t1."timestamp"=t2."timestamp")
where
        t1.id_instrument= ?
        AND t1.id_stock_exchange= ?
        --careful with TIMEZONE here!
        AND t1."timestamp">= ?
        AND t1."timestamp"<= ?
ORDER BY t1."timestamp" ASC;

If I hand over java.util.Date or java.sql.Date or java.sql.Timestamp the
query will be executed but returns the wrong number of records;

However, if I change the query into:
-- GET TICKDATA
select
        t1.id_instrument,
        t1.id_stock_exchange,
        t1."timestamp",
        t1.price,
        coalesce(t2.quantity,0) quantity
from
        trader.tickdata t1
        left join trader.volumedata t2
                ON (t1.id_instrument=t2.id_instrument AND
t1.id_stock_exchange=t2.id_stock_exchange AND
t1."timestamp"=t2."timestamp")
where
        t1.id_instrument= ?
        AND t1.id_stock_exchange= ?
        --careful with TIMEZONE here!
        AND t1."timestamp">= cast(? as timestamp)
        AND t1."timestamp"<= cast(? as timestamp)
ORDER BY t1."timestamp" ASC;

and hand over a formated date "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss" it works correctly.
Now I have on simple questions please:

What is the correct way to hand over a Java Date parameter (avoiding the
double String manipulation)?

Thank you and best regards!
Andreas




--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Reichel
Date:
Subject: Timestamp vs. Java Date/Timestamp
Next
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp vs. Java Date/Timestamp