Re: extended query protcol violation? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: extended query protcol violation?
Date
Msg-id CADK3HHJ8D-ZcOsRW58Y+AwRq7YnRs_h01e=SDPK4wby5GBUGJA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: extended query protcol violation?  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers




On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 08:18, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>> > Curious what client is this that is violating the protocol.
>>
>> I heard it was a Java program.
>>
>
> This is not surprising there are a proliferation of non-blocking
> implementations,
> probably approaching 10 different implementations now.

Do you think some of the implementations may not be appropriate if
they behave like that discussed in this thread? If so, maybe it is
worth to add a warning to the backend.

Given that java code is notorious for not reading warnings, I'd say no
That said I'd probably be in favour of a DEBUG mode that did warn. 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: extended query protcol violation?
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition