On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes: > So an unsigned long won't fit inside a java long either, but hopefully it > will never be necessary. That would be a huge number of changes.
I think we'll all be safely dead by the time anybody manages to process 2^63 rows in one PG command ;-). If you can widen the value from int to long on the Java side, that should be sufficient.