Re: Slowness of extended protocol - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Slowness of extended protocol
Date
Msg-id CADK3HH+bLSifJB6CEhN18Wn2sA4H__ir=pO_MzF57yyd6xrovA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Slowness of extended protocol  (Shay Rojansky <roji@roji.org>)
Responses Re: Slowness of extended protocol  (Shay Rojansky <roji@roji.org>)
List pgsql-hackers

I'm not going to respond to the part about dealing with prepared statements errors, since I think we've already covered that and there's nothing new being said. I don't find automatic savepointing acceptable, and a significant change of the PostgreSQL protocol to support this doesn't seem reasonable (but you can try proposing).

As mentioned before. JDBC is not the only postgres driver to do this the ODBC driver does this as well. This is a requested feature by users. We didn't just decide to do it on our own.

One thing to keep in mind is that both JDBC and ODBC are not exclusively PostgreSQL drivers and as such we sometimes have to jump through hoops to provide the semantics requested by the API. 



 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Why --backup-and-modify-in-place in perltidy config?
Next
From: Shay Rojansky
Date:
Subject: Re: Slowness of extended protocol