Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: C trigger significantly slower than PL/pgSQL? - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: C trigger significantly slower than PL/pgSQL?
Date
Msg-id CADK3HH+_Vi4uoRaQmDSNPoZfAvm8A_NLQ87=EaXv1DxxXYrmsQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C trigger significantly slower than PL/pgSQL?  (pgchem pgchem <pgchem@tuschehund.de>)
Responses Re: C trigger significantly slower than PL/pgSQL?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-interfaces
Tree view


On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 07:33, pgchem pgchem <pgchem@tuschehund.de> wrote:
Hello Dave,
 
> It would be infinitely easier to answer this question if you posted both functions and the plans 
 
before posting lengthy code to the list, I just wanted to verify beforehand that this is not a well known issue.
Fair. So to answer your question. The C function should be faster.


Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks

pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: pgchem pgchem
Date:
Subject: Re: C trigger significantly slower than PL/pgSQL?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: C trigger significantly slower than PL/pgSQL?