Re: One question about connection parameter stringtype - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: One question about connection parameter stringtype
Date
Msg-id CADK3HH+FnJwYXh25ndjuH8xaFnG0MhatMAf+pVuER8XG0dJ1uQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to One question about connection parameter stringtype  (夏 \xEFw <kavi314@icloud.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
I suspect specifying strings in setString is faster on the backend

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca


On 29 May 2014 05:31, 夏 飛 <kavi314@icloud.com> wrote:
Hi,

When i run my program which use pgjdbc,a error happened.


my program looks like the following:

PreparedStatement pstmt = con.prepareStatement("select 1=?");
pstmt.setString(1, null);
pstmt.executeUpdate();

error message:
operator does not exist: integer = character varying

The error's resean is just as the error message said, and i known this can be avoided
by set stringtype=unspecified in url. But i still have two question。

1)when stringtype is setted to be "unspecified",is there any bad think would happen?

2)If the answer of 1)is "nothing",why pgjdbc not setting the default value of stringtype to "unspecified"

kavi314

--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: getFastLong gets longs slowly
Next
From: David Wall
Date:
Subject: Upgrading from PG 8.3.3 to 9.3.4 - FATAL: invalid value for parameter "TimeZone": "PST"