Re: the doc should mention one particular aspect of partial indexes - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Chaouki Dhib
Subject Re: the doc should mention one particular aspect of partial indexes
Date
Msg-id CAD6mX12NLTXTnwWz_qpOsKLsE8CZC3yXoU=ARjDeDpMDbhCzeA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: the doc should mention one particular aspect of partial indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-docs
I guess it isn't. My apologies. This is something I ignored about PG
until now. Thank you for your reply.


Le lun. 18 janv. 2021 à 21:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> a écrit :
>
> PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> > I think the documentation should mention one particular aspect of b-tree
> > partial indexes:
> > Say we have a row that satisfy a partial index's predicate. That row will be
> > referenced by the partial index. Say now that this row gets updated in such
> > a way that the updated row no longer satisfies the predicate. The entry of
> > that row in the index (more precisely, the row previous version) is still
> > kept in a leaf node of the b-tree until a VACUUM is issued on the index's
> > table.
>
> How is this different from the behavior for any other dead row version?
>
>                         regards, tom lane



pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: Windows Powershell
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Need help on translating documentation