On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:49 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> writes:
> > I don't think we need additional PG_TRY() for that since exec_stmts()
> > is already called in PG_TRY() if there is an exception block. I meant
> > to call stmt_end() in PG_CATCH() in exec_stmt_block() (i.e. only when
> > an error is caught by the exception block). Currently, if an error is
> > caught, we call stmt_begin() and stmt_end() for statements executed
> > inside the exception block but call only stmt_begin() for the
> > statement that raised an error.
>
> I fail to see anything wrong with that. We never completed execution
> of the statement that raised an error, but calling stmt_end for it
> would imply that we did.
Thank you for the comment. Agreed.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
