On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 11:09 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:32:54AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:23 AM Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> > > Right, or ensure that the actual IV used is distinct (such as by using
> > > another bit in the IV to distinguish logged-vs-unlogged), but it seems
> > > saner to just use a different key, ultimately.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > I think we also need to consider how to make sure nonce is unique when
> > making a page dirty by updating hint bits. Hint bit update changes the
> > page contents but doesn't change the page lsn if we already write a
> > full page write. In the PoC patch, I logged a dummy WAL record
> > (XLOG_NOOP) just to move the page lsn forward, but since this is
> > required even when changing the page is not the first time since the
> > last checkpoint we might end up logging too many dummy WAL records.
>
> This says:
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Transparent_Data_Encryption#Other_requirements
>
> wal_log_hints will be enabled automatically in encryption mode.
>
> Does that help?
IIUC it helps but not enough. When wal_log_hints is enabled, we write
a full-page image when updating hint bits if it's the first time
change for the page since the last checkpoint. But I'm concerned that
what if we change hint bits again after the page is flushed. We would
mark the page as dirtied but not write any WAL, leaving the page lsn
as it is.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
