Re: BUG #17580: use pg_terminate_backend to terminate a wal sender process may wait a long time - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: BUG #17580: use pg_terminate_backend to terminate a wal sender process may wait a long time
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoD+aNfLje+9JOqWbTiq1GL4BOp9_f7FxLADm8rS8cDhCQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #17580: use pg_terminate_backend to terminate a wal sender process may wait a long time  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: BUG #17580: use pg_terminate_backend to terminate a wal sender process may wait a long time  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Hi,

On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:27 AM 巨鲸 <13207961@qq.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiko,
> I think maybe you should use filter-tables to filter the test table, likes:
>        filter-tables="public.test666"
>

Thanks, I could reproduce this issue with the option. And I've
confirmed this issue exists also in the latest minor version, 10.22,
and HEAD.

If the plugin filters out all changes, there is no place to check the
interruptions. So I think it makes sense to add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS
to the main loop of processing logical change. It would be better to
do that on the core, rather than the plugin side. I've attached the
patch. I think we should backpatch to 10.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/

Attachment

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: No-op updates with partitioning and logical replication started failing in version 13
Next
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: No-op updates with partitioning and logical replication started failing in version 13