On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:14 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:47 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:00 PM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > Another comment on the 0001 patch: as there is now a mix of setting
> > > "apply_error_callback_arg" members directly and also through inline
> > > functions, it might look better to have it done consistently with
> > > functions having prototypes something like the following:
> > >
> > > static inline void set_apply_error_context_rel(LogicalRepRelMapEntry *rel);
> > > static inline void reset_apply_error_context_rel(void);
> > > static inline void set_apply_error_context_attnum(int remote_attnum);
> >
> > It might look consistent, but if we do that, we will end up needing
> > functions every field to update when we add new fields to the struct
> > in the future?
> >
>
> Yeah, I also think it is too much, but we can add comments where ever
> we set the information for error callback. I see it is missing when
> the patch is setting remote_attnum, see similar other places and add
> comments if already not there.
Agred. Will add comments in the next version patch.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
