Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:12 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
> > On 27 Apr 2023, at 16:06, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 12:02 PM John Naylor
> > <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> >> ...that call to background_psql doesn't look like other ones that have "key => value". Is there something I'm
missing?
> >
> > Thanks for reporting. I think that the patch needs to be updated since
> > commit 664d757531e1 changed background psql TAP functions. I've
> > attached the updated patch.
>
> Is there a risk that the background psql will time out on slow systems during
> the consumption of 2B xid's?  Since you mainly want to hold it open for the
> duration of testing you might want to bump it to avoid false negatives on slow
> test systems.

Agreed. The timeout can be set by manually setting
PG_TEST_TIMEOUT_DEFAULT, but I bump it to 10 min by default. And it
now require setting PG_TET_EXTRA to run it.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com