Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sawada Masahiko
Subject Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoCCO-o6PyQOn-2ok9WRdTXkuWjHChNHGvaA8oU00Wkscw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> ISTM that REINDEX is not consistent with VACUUM, ANALYZE or CLUSTER in
>> the way it issues NOTICE messages.
>
>> I'm inclined to simply remove the NOTICE messages, except when a
>> REINDEX ... VERBOSE is requested.
>
> My recollection is that those other commands do issue messages always,
> but at some DEBUGn log level when not VERBOSE.  Ideally REINDEX would
> adopt that same behavior.
>

So it seems to that REINDEX command issues messages as INFO level when
that is  specified VERBOSE option.
If not specified, it issue message as DEBUG2.

Regards,

-------
Sawada Masahiko



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA
Next
From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA