On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:03 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Em ter, 23 de jan de 2018 às 03:36, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> While reading the code, I realized that the requesting an autovacuum
>> work-item could fail in silence if work-item array is full. So the
>> users cannot realize that work-item is never performed.
>> AutoVacuumRequestWork() seems to behave so from the initial
>> implementation but is there any reason of such behavior? It seems to
>> me that it can be a problem even now that there is only one kind of
>> work-item. Attached patch for fixing it.
>
>
> Seems reasonable but maybe you can use the word "worker" instead of "work
> item" for report message.
>
Thank you for the comment.
Or can we use the word "work-item" since the commit log and source
code use this word?
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
