On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 8:29 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> > Do you think that it's okay that we rely on the propagation of global
> > state to parallel workers on Postgres 13? Don't we need something like
> > my fixup commit 49f49def on Postgres 13 as well? At least for the
> > EXEC_BACKEND case, I think.
>
> Uh ... *what* propagation of global state to parallel workers? Workers
> fork off from the postmaster, not from their leader process.
Right. I think we should apply that fix on PG13 as well.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
