Re: Is Recovery actually paused? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoByNjTUm98U535xHNuFgwyy+ZJD-wVV11dukJUN227oMA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is Recovery actually paused?  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Is Recovery actually paused?  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 12:28 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ---
> +       /* test for recovery pause if user has requested the pause */
> +       if (((volatile XLogCtlData *) XLogCtl)->recoveryPause)
> +           recoveryPausesHere(false);
> +
> +       now = GetCurrentTimestamp();
> +
>
> Hmm, if the recovery pauses here, the wal receiver isn't launched even
> when wal_retrieve_retry_interval has passed, which seems not good. I
> think we want the recovery to be paused but want the wal receiver to
> continue receiving WAL.

I had misunderstood the code and the patch, please ignore this
comment. Pausing the recovery here is fine with me.

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
EnterpriseDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY FREEZE and setting PD_ALL_VISIBLE/visibility map bits
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts