Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoByDcAN1cwsw5v8VZmT4H4EOQZ0pH6SwLczd0YXNRq0_A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 8:06 PM John Naylor
<john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 3:18 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 2:02 PM John Naylor
> > <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> Attached is an update that mostly has the modest goal of getting CI green again. v19-0003 has squashed the entire
radixtree template from previously. I've kept out the perf test module for now -- still needs updating. 
>
> > > [05:44:11.819] test_radixtree.c.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved
> > > external symbol pg_popcount64
> > > [05:44:11.819] src\test\modules\test_radixtree\test_radixtree.dll :
> > > fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
> >
> > Yeah, I'm not sure what's causing that. Since that comes from a debugging function, we could work around it, but it
wouldbe nice to understand why, so I'll probably have to experiment on my CI repo. 
>
> I'm still confused by this error, because it only occurs in the test module. I successfully built with just 0002 in
CIso elsewhere where bmw_* symbols resolve just fine on all platforms. I've worked around the error in v19-0004 by
usingthe general-purpose pg_popcount() function. We only need to count bits in assert builds, so it doesn't matter a
wholelot. 

I spent today investigating this issue, I found out that on Windows,
libpgport_src.a is not linked when building codes outside of
src/backend unless explicitly linking it. It's not a problem on Linux
etc. but the linker raises a fatal error on Windows. I'm not sure the
right way to fix it but the attached patch resolved the issue on
cfbot. Since it seems not to be related to 0002 patch but maybe the
designed behavior or a problem in meson. We can discuss it on a
separate thread.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Add proper planner support for ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates
Next
From: "Karl O. Pinc"
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc: Rework contrib appendix -- informative titles, tweaked sentences