Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoBVn3_5qC_CKeKSXTu963mM=n9-GxzF7KCPreTTMS+JGQ@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> At Tue, 22 Mar 2016 23:08:36 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote in <CAHGQGwFYG829=2r4mxV0ULeBNaUuG0ek_10yymx8Cu-gLYcLng@mail.gmail.com> >>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI >>> <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> > Thank you for the revised patch. >>> >>> Thanks for reviewing the patch! >>> >>> > This version looks to focus on n-priority method. Stuffs for the >>> > other methods like n-quorum has been removed. It is okay for me. >>> >>> I don't think it's so difficult to extend this version so that >>> it supports also quorum commit. >> >> Mmm. I think I understand this just now. As Sawada-san said >> before, all standbys in a single-level quorum set having the same >> sync_standby_prioirity, the current algorithm works as it is. It >> also true for the case that some quorum sets are in a priority >> set. >> >> What about some priority sets in a quorum set? We should surely consider it that when we support more than 1 nest level configuration. IMO, we can have another information which indicates current sync standbys instead of sync_priority. For now, we are'nt trying to support even quorum method, so we could consider it after we can support both priority method and quorum method without incident. >>> > StringInfo for double-quoted names seems to me to be overkill, >>> > since it allocates 1024 byte block for every such name. A static >>> > buffer seems enough for the usage as I said. >>> >>> So, what about changing the scanner code as follows? >>> >>> <xd>{xdstop} { >>> yylval.str = pstrdup(xdbuf.data); >>> pfree(xdbuf.data); >>> BEGIN(INITIAL); >>> return NAME; >>> >>> > The parser is called for not only for SIGHUP, but also for >>> > starting of every walsender. The latter is not necessary but it >>> > is the matter of trade-off between simplisity and >>> > effectiveness. >>> >>> Could you elaborate why you think that's not necessary? >> >> Sorry, starting of walsender is not so large problem, 1024 bytes >> memory is just abandoned once. SIGHUP is rather a problem. >> >> The part is called under two kinds of memory context, "config >> file processing" then "Replication command context". The former >> is deleted just after reading the config file so no harm but the >> latter is a quite long-lasting context and every reloading bloats >> the context with abandoned memory blocks. It is needed to be >> pfreed or to use a memory context with shorter lifetime, or use >> static storage of 64 byte-length, even though the bloat become >> visible after very many times of conf reloads. > > SyncRepInitConfig()->SyncRepFreeConfig() has already pfree'd that > in the patch. Or am I missing something? > >>> BTW, in previous patch, s_s_names is parsed by postmaster during the server >>> startup. A child process takes over the internal data struct for the parsed >>> s_s_names when it's forked by the postmaster. This is what the previous >>> patch was expecting. However, this doesn't work in EXEC_BACKEND environment. >>> In that environment, the data struct should be passed to a child process via >>> the special file (like write_nondefault_variables() does), or it should >>> be constructed during walsender startup (like latest version of the patch >>> does). IMO the latter is simpler. >> >> Ah, I haven't notice that but I agree with it. >> >> >> As per my previous comment, syncrep_scanner.l doesn't reject some >> (nonprintable and multibyte) characters in a name, which is to be >> silently replaced with '?' for application_name. It would not be >> a problem for almost all of us but might be needed to be >> documented if we won't change the behavior to be the same as >> application_name. > > There are three options: > > 1. Replace nonprintable and non-ASCII characters in s_s_names with ? > 2. Emit an error if s_s_names contains nonprintable and non-ASCII characters > 3. Do nothing (9.5 or before behave in this way) > > You implied that we should choose #1 or #2? Previous(9.5 or before) s_s_names also accepts non-ASCII character and non-printable character, and can show it without replacing these character to '?'. From backward compatibility perspective, we should not choose #1 or #2. Different behaviour between previous and current s_s_names is that previous s_s_names doesn't accept the node name having the sort of white-space character that isspace() returns true with. But current s_s_names allows us to specify such a node name. I guess that changing such behaviour is enough for fixing this issue. Thoughts? > >> By the way, the following documentation fix mentioned by Thomas, >> >> - to as 2-safe replication in computer science theory. >> + to as group-safe replication in computer science theory. >> >> should be restored if the discussion in the following message is >> true. And some supplemental description would be needed. >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160316.164833.188624159.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp > > Yeah, the document needs to be updated. I will do that. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada
pgsql-hackers by date: