Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoBPt-Nc+x5hrqoQHJ0Ks7vSviX13K181T97QEc4rSp_1A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 7:04 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 1:43 PM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 02, 2022 at 04:33:44PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > It seems that 0/B0706F72 is not a random value. Two subscriber logs
> > > show the same value. Since 0x70 = 'p', 0x6F = 'o', and 0x72 = 'r', it
> > > might show the next field in the pg_subscription catalog, i.e.,
> > > subconninfo. The subscription is created by "CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub
> > > CONNECTION 'port=57851 host=/tmp/6u2vRwQYik dbname=postgres'
> > > PUBLICATION pub WITH (disable_on_error = true, streaming = on,
> > > two_phase = on)".
> > >
> > > Given subscription.sql passes, something is wrong when we read the
> > > subskiplsn value by like "sub->skiplsn = subform->subskiplsn;".
> >
> > That's a good clue.  We've never made pg_type.typalign able to represent
> > alignment as it works on AIX.  A uint64 like pg_lsn has 8-byte alignment, so
> > the C struct follows from that.  At the typalign level, we have only these:
> >
> > #define  TYPALIGN_CHAR                  'c' /* char alignment (i.e. unaligned) */
> > #define  TYPALIGN_SHORT                 's' /* short alignment (typically 2 bytes) */
> > #define  TYPALIGN_INT                   'i' /* int alignment (typically 4 bytes) */
> > #define  TYPALIGN_DOUBLE                'd' /* double alignment (often 8 bytes) */
> >
> > On AIX, they are:
> >
> > #define ALIGNOF_DOUBLE 4
> > #define ALIGNOF_INT 4
> > #define ALIGNOF_LONG 8
> > /* #undef ALIGNOF_LONG_LONG_INT */
> > /* #undef ALIGNOF_PG_INT128_TYPE */
> > #define ALIGNOF_SHORT 2
> >
> > uint64 and pg_lsn use TYPALIGN_DOUBLE.  For AIX, they really need a typalign
> > corresponding to ALIGNOF_LONG.  Hence, the C struct layout doesn't match the
> > tuple layout.  Columns potentially affected:
> >
> > [local] test=*# select attrelid::regclass, attname from pg_attribute a join pg_class c on c.oid = attrelid where
attalign= 'd' and relkind = 'r' and attnotnull and attlen <> -1; 
> >     attrelid     │   attname
> > ─────────────────┼──────────────
> >  pg_sequence     │ seqstart
> >  pg_sequence     │ seqincrement
> >  pg_sequence     │ seqmax
> >  pg_sequence     │ seqmin
> >  pg_sequence     │ seqcache
> >  pg_subscription │ subskiplsn
> > (6 rows)
> >
> > The pg_sequence fields evade trouble, because there's exactly eight bytes (two
> > oids) before them.

Thanks for helping with the investigation!

> >
> >
> > Some options:
> > - Move subskiplsn after subdbid, so it's always aligned anyway.  I've
> >   confirmed that this lets the test pass, in 44s.
> > - Move subskiplsn to the CATALOG_VARLEN section, despite its fixed length.
> >
>
> +1 to any one of the above. I mildly prefer the first option as that
> will allow us to access the value directly instead of going via
> SysCacheGetAttr but I am fine either way.

+1. I also prefer the first option.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: A qsort template
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences