On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 9:00 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 11:46 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Agreed. Attached the updated patch.
> >
>
> Thanks, the patch looks good to me. I think it would be probably good
> to backpatch this but it has the potential to break some monitoring
> scripts which were using the wrong columns for transaction id and spec
> token number.
Right.
> As this is not a very critical issue and is not reported
> till now, so it may be better to leave backpatching it. What do you
> think?
Considering the compatibility, I'm inclined to agree not to backpatch
it. If someone complains about the current behavior in back branches
in the future, we can backpatch it.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
