Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoAeOSj2X_0zJ-trkYu+q6VR60EjOFJSBe6G2pGUyQPebQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 10:27 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 03:21:38PM +0530, Shlok Kyal wrote:
> > I have tested the scenario shared by you on the thread [1]. And I
> > confirm that the latest patch [2] fixes this issue.
> >
> > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoAenVqiMjpN-PvGHL1N9DWnHSq673bfgr6phmBUzx=kLQ@mail.gmail.com
> > [2]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANhcyEWfqdUvn2d2KOdvkhebBi5VO6O8J%2BC6%2BOwsPNwCTM%3DakQ%40mail.gmail.com
>
> Sawada-san, are you planning to look at that?  It looks like this
> thread is waiting for your input.

Sorry I lost track of this thread. I'll check the test results and patch soon.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Skip collecting decoded changes of already-aborted transactions
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Unmark gen_random_uuid() function leakproof