On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> How about instead changing things so that we specifically reject
>>> indexes? And maybe some kind of a check that will reject anything
>>> that lacks a relfilnode? That seems like it would be more on point.
>>
>> I agree, I don't have strong opinion about this.
>> It would be good to add condition for rejecting only indexes.
>> Attached patches are,
>> - Change heap2 rmgr description
>> - Add condition to pg_visibility
>> - Fix typo in pgvisibility.sgml
>> (Sorry for the late notice..)
>
> OK, committed the first and last of those. I think the other one
> needs some work yet; the error message doesn't seem like it is quite
> our usual style, and if we're going to do something here we should
> probably also insert a check to throw a better error when there is no
> relfilenode.
>
Thank you for your advising and suggestion!
Attached latest 2 patches.
* 000 patch : Incorporated the review comments and made rewriting
logic more clearly.
* 001 patch : Incorporated the documentation suggestions and updated
logic a little.
Please review them.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
