Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoA5HrhXqwbYLpSobGzV6rWoJmH3-NB9J3YarKDwARBj4w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side  (Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>)
Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side  (Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>)
RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side  ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side  ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side  (Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>)
Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side  (Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 8:03 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 1:36 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 6:24 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 9:11 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Okay, changed accordingly. Additionally, I have changed the code which
> > > > sets timestamp to (unset) when it is 0 so that it won't display the
> > > > timestamp in that case. I have made few other cosmetic changes in the
> > > > attached patch. See and let me know what you think of it?
> > >
> > > Thank you for the patch!
> > >
> > > Agreed with these changes. The patch looks good to me.
> > >
> >
> > Pushed, feel free to rebase and send the remaining patch set.
>
> Thanks!
>
> I'll post the updated version patch on Monday.

I've attached rebased patches. 0004 patch is not the scope of this
patch. It's borrowed from another thread[1] to fix the assertion
failure for newly added tests. Please review them.

Regards,

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFiTN-v-zFpmm7Ze1Dai5LJjhhNYXvK8QABs35X89WY0HDG4Ww%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
EDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: list of acknowledgments for PG14
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?