Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Perf decreased although server is better - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Perf decreased although server is better
Date
Msg-id CACjxUsOVpfTXB=JnZGZGE0O7RNRM5qmkv9K-Ui+uE_NHWCsPfg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Perf decreased although server is better  (Benjamin Toueg <btoueg@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Perf decreased although server is better
List pgsql-performance
Tree view 
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Benjamin Toueg <btoueg@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't see how this can be due to network latency!

I'm not suggesting it is due to network latency -- it is due to the
latency for storage requests.  That won't depend on network latency
unless you are going to a LAN for storage.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Rick Otten
Date:
Subject: Re: Perf decreased although server is better
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: archive_command too slow.