Re: Misdesigned command/status APIs for parallel dump/restore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Misdesigned command/status APIs for parallel dump/restore
Date
Msg-id CACjxUsO4k=Y3W1_Lo=iX5CLg4FDvstxZofOtUaaOt2FL+8pN0g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Misdesigned command/status APIs for parallel dump/restore  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
This patch also applied with minor offsets, compiled without
warning, and passes regression tests, including `make check-world`
with TAP tests enabled.  It looks good to me, presenting a cleaner
API.

I really want to get this to the point where we can dump and
restore nested materialized views better, and this doesn't get us
to the point where that's immediately possible; but with a cleaner
API it should be easier to get there, so this is a step along the
way.

Setting to Ready for Committer.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Supporting huge pages on Windows
Next
From: Vitaly Burovoy
Date:
Subject: Re: Detect supported SET parameters when pg_restore is run